I am not sure if this will further the discussion, but as I was reading Hebrews 4:2 I noticed a interesting use of “gospel” which should inform this wide vs. narrow view of the gospel. Hebrews 4:2 says:
καὶ γάρ ἐσμεν εὐηγγελισμένοι καθάπερ κἀκεῖνοι
For good news came to us just as to them
Two things are evident from this passage.
First, the author of Hebrews uses “gospel” in the wide sense. The wilderness generation did not hear the good news of justification by faith. They heard the good news that God would deliver them from slavery and bring them to Canaan (Exod. 3:16-17; 4:27-31). This was in fulfillment of the promises made to the fathers, especially Abraham. Therefore the writers of Scripture are not fearful of using gospel in the wider sense even after the cross.
But secondly, in the scope of redemptive history, the promise to Abraham was fulfilled ultimately in Jesus. Jesus is the seed, he is the ultimate blessing. So the good news sometimes is focused on the restoration of God’s kingdom, but on this side of salvation history we can see that this is accomplished through the cross. In fact the author of Hebrews says that his hearers are “more responsible” than the previous hearers because of the revelation of the Son.
The revelation of the Son is better, more complete, more perfect.
So in summary we can learn the following from this passage and use of the term gospel.
- The writers of Scripture used the Gospel in both the narrow and wide sense.
- After the cross, the fundamental aspect of the Gospel is lost if one focuses on the gospel in the broader sense, without getting to Jesus’ sacrifice.





Patrick,
I appreciate your distinction between the narrow and wide concepts of the gospel. I also agree that the fundamental aspect of the gospel is lost went we leave out Jesus’ sacrifice. Contra Gilbert, Carson and DeYoung, however, I don’t think that one ought to think of Penal Substitution as the most essential aspect of the gospel. They seem to be saying that “the kingdom is important but no one is going to get saved by believing in the kingdom; rather, the (part?) of the gospel that saves is when one believes how God saves us from our sin.” I am not downplaying the (first) importance of the Messiah dying for our sins but we also need to preach who it is that is dying for our sins, namely, the Messiah (king)of Israel who is now Lord of the world. That concept goes with the wider concept of the gospel and is just as essential. If the forgiveness of sins is left out then we deceive people into thinking that sin is a problem “out there” that one does not have to reckon with; if we leave out Christology then we risk making the gospel about “me and my salvation” with obedience to the resurrected Lord of the world as an afterthought. One can easily see how the apostles emphasize this in their sermons in Acts:
18:8 – the kingdom of God
20:24-27 – the gospel of the grace of God … the kingdom … the whole counsel of God
4:2 – in Jesus the resurrection from the dead
5:42 – Jesus is Christ
8:5 – the Christ
9:20 – [Jesus] is the Son of God
10:36 – good news of peace through Jesus Christ (he is Lord of all)
13:38 – forgiveness of sins
20:21 – repentance toward God and of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ